• xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.header.title
    • français
    • English
  • Help
  • Login
  • Language 
    • Français
    • English
View Item 
  •   BIRD Home
  • DRM (UMR CNRS 7088)
  • DRM : Publications
  • View Item
  •   BIRD Home
  • DRM (UMR CNRS 7088)
  • DRM : Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

BIRDResearch centres & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesTypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesType

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors
Thumbnail

Assessing France's joint audit requirement: are two heads better than one?

Vanstraelen, Ann; Richard, Chrystelle; Francis, Jere (2006-06), Assessing France's joint audit requirement: are two heads better than one?, International Symposium on Audit Research, 2006-06, Sydney, Australie

View/Open
Francis_AssessingFrancesJoint.pdf (159.6Kb)
Type
Communication / Conférence
Date
2006-06
Conference title
International Symposium on Audit Research
Conference date
2006-06
Conference city
Sydney
Conference country
Australie
Pages
54
Metadata
Show full item record
Author(s)
Vanstraelen, Ann
Richard, Chrystelle
Francis, Jere
Abstract (EN)
We examine auditor choice for listed companies in France where two (joint) auditors are required by law. The joint audit requirement creates a unique setting to study if a firm’s ownership structure affects its auditor-pair choice as well the consequences on earning quality. The results support predictions from agency theory that higher quality (Big 4) auditors are more likely to be used as external monitors when there is greater separation of ownership and control and increased information asymmetry between the firm and outsiders. A Big 4 auditor (paired with a non-Big 4 auditor) is more likely to be used for firms with more diversified ownership structures and less family blockholdings, and these associations are even stronger for firms with two Big 4 auditors conducting the joint audit. We also test if a firm’s auditor-pair choice affects earnings quality and find that firms using one Big 4 auditor (paired with a non-Big 4 auditor) have smaller income-increasing abnormal accruals compared to firms that use no Big 4 auditors, and once again this effect is even stronger for firms that use two Big 4 auditors. While French firms do have more concentrated ownership structures than Anglo-America firms, we conclude that cross-sectional differences in ownership structures create economic incentives that affect auditor-pair choices under France’s joint auditor requirement, and that earnings are of high quality when audited by Big 4 auditors. Finally, we report evidence that French audit fees are no higher under a joint audit approach compared to other European countries. While we do not know if the joint audit approach necessarily produces a better quality audit than the single- auditor approach used in most countries, we do find that French firms are valued more highly than neighboring firms in Belgium, which has a similar legal and regulatory system, and this finding suggests investors may perceive two heads (auditors) are better than one in reducing information uncertainty with respect to reported earnings.
Subjects / Keywords
France; Joint Audit; Earnings Quality; Auditor Choice; Ownership Structure
JEL
M42 - Auditing

Related items

Showing items related by title and author.

  • Thumbnail
    Quelques voies de recherche françaises en audit 
    Bédard, Jean; Gonthier-Besacier, Nathalie; Richard, Chrystelle (2001) Chapitre d'ouvrage
  • Thumbnail
    Qualité de l’audit et Satisfaction de l’audité : Chronique d’une Innovation Ordinaire 
    Richard, Chrystelle; Cerutti, Fabien (2008) Communication / Conférence
  • Thumbnail
    The quality of a peers' relationship, a determinant of audit quality: An understanding of French legal audit 
    Richard, Chrystelle (2001) Communication / Conférence
  • Thumbnail
    Renewable long-term audit mandates and audit quality : a qualitative and quantitative analysis 
    Richard, Chrystelle; Vanstraelen, Ann (1999) Communication / Conférence
  • Thumbnail
    Effet de l’obligation de publier les honoraires d’audit sur les honoraires d’audit des exercices ultérieurs : Le cas français / Impact of the Public Fee Disclosure Requirement on Subsequent Period Fees: France Evidence 
    Chouaya, Adel (2008) Communication / Conférence
Dauphine PSL Bibliothèque logo
Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Phone: 01 44 05 40 94
Contact
Dauphine PSL logoEQUIS logoCreative Commons logo