
Efficient brain lesion segmentation using multi-modality tissue-based feature selection and support vector machines
Fiot, Jean-Baptiste; Cohen, Laurent D.; Raniga, Parnesh; Fripp, Jürgen (2013), Efficient brain lesion segmentation using multi-modality tissue-based feature selection and support vector machines, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 29, 9, p. 905-915. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnm.2537
Type
Article accepté pour publication ou publiéDate
2013Journal name
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical EngineeringVolume
29Number
9Publisher
Wiley
Pages
905-915
Publication identifier
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor(s)
Fiot, Jean-BaptisteCohen, Laurent D.
CEntre de REcherches en MAthématiques de la DEcision [CEREMADE]
Raniga, Parnesh
Fripp, Jürgen
Abstract (EN)
Support vector machines (SVM) are machine learning techniques that have been used for segmentation and classification of medical images, including segmentation of white matter hyper-intensities (WMH). Current approaches using SVM for WMH segmentation extract features from the brain and classify these followed by complex post-processing steps to remove false positives. The method presented in this paper combines advanced pre-processing, tissue-based feature selection and SVM classification to obtain efficient and accurate WMH segmentation. Features from 125 patients, generated from up to four MR modalities [T1-w, T2-w, proton-density and fluid attenuated inversion recovery(FLAIR)], differing neighbourhood sizes and the use of multi-scale features were compared. We found that although using all four modalities gave the best overall classification (average Dice scores of 0.54 ± 0.12, 0.72 ± 0.06 and 0.82 ± 0.06 respectively for small, moderate and severe lesion loads); this was not significantly different (p = 0.50) from using just T1-w and FLAIR sequences (Dice scores of 0.52 ± 0.13, 0.71 ± 0.08 and 0.81 ± 0.07). Furthermore, there was a negligible difference between using 5 × 5 × 5 and 3 × 3 × 3 features (p = 0.93). Finally, we show that careful consideration of features and pre-processing techniques not only saves storage space and computation time but also leads to more efficient classification, which outperforms the one based on all features with post-processing.Subjects / Keywords
image processing; brain lesion; segmentation; classification; support vector machinesRelated items
Showing items related by title and author.
-
Fiot, Jean-Baptiste; Cohen, Laurent D.; Raniga, Parnesh; Fripp, Jürgen (2012) Communication / Conférence
-
Fiot, Jean-Baptiste; Fripp, Jürgen; Cohen, Laurent D. (2012) Communication / Conférence
-
Fiot, Jean-Baptiste; Cohen, Laurent D.; Bourgeat, Pierrick; Raniga, Parnesh; Acosta, Oscar; Villemagne, Victor; Salvado, Olivier; Fripp, Jürgen (2012) Communication / Conférence
-
Cohen, Laurent D.; Fiot, Jean-Baptiste; Fripp, Jürgen; Raguet, Hugo; Risser, Laurent; Vialard, François-Xavier (2014) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
-
Fiot, Jean-Baptiste; Risser, Laurent; Cohen, Laurent D.; Fripp, Jürgen; Vialard, François-Xavier (2012) Communication / Conférence