Show simple item record

hal.structure.identifier
dc.contributor.authorThuelin, Élisabeth*
hal.structure.identifier
dc.contributor.authorHenneron, Sandrine*
hal.structure.identifier
dc.contributor.authorTouron, Philippe*
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-27T11:27:37Z
dc.date.available2009-07-27T11:27:37Z
dc.date.issued2006-08
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/1383
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectFranceen
dc.subjectCorporate communicationsen
dc.subjectFinancial reportingen
dc.subjectAnnual reportsen
dc.subjectDisclosureen
dc.subjectRisk managementen
dc.subject.ddc658.1en
dc.subject.classificationjelD81en
dc.subject.classificationjelG24en
dc.titleRisk regulations and financial disclosure : an investigation based on corporate communication in french traded companiesen
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstractenPurpose of the paper: Risk orientated disclosure is a focal issue of corporate communication. Many provisions have been implemented in the USA and in Europe to promote transparency about risks faced by companies, especially by quoted ones. The increase of mandatory risk reporting applying to companies leads to the question of whether or how companies are compliant with these regulations. The answer itself implies further questions: what is required to be disclosed? And what is risk? The purpose of this paper is to address these issues.Methodology: The paper uses a qualitative methodology based on Huberman and Miles (1994) in order to explore the collected data (annual reports of companies, laws, accounting standards, professional sources).Findings: The paper established an inventory of rules currently existing in order to identify the risk disclosure context faced by French companies and found that there is no consensus between the different pieces of legislation. It is demonstrated that the terminology referred to by companies tends to differ from one to another.Research limitations: The study focused on risk disclosure within annual reports of listed companies and on risk reporting within mandatory provisions. Practical implications: A consensus on the definition of risk needs to be reached in order to assess company management, as well as their compliance with provisions. Originality/value: An attempt is made to set up a framework which could eliminate deficiencies in the lack of consensus in laws and company practice.en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameCorporate communications
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol11en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue3en
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2006-08
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages303-326en
dc.description.sponsorshipprivateouien
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherMCB University Pressen
dc.subject.ddclabelOrganisation et finances d'entrepriseen
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record