Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStolowy, Hervé
dc.contributor.authorRichard, Jacques
dc.contributor.authorDing, Yuan
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-27T13:02:26Z
dc.date.available2009-07-27T13:02:26Z
dc.date.issued2008-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/1389
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectUnited Statesen
dc.subjectJapanen
dc.subjectGreat Britainen
dc.subjectGermanyen
dc.subjectFranceen
dc.subjectCorporate governanceen
dc.subjectStakeholder/shareholder modelsen
dc.subjectSocial nature of accountingen
dc.subjectAccounting historyen
dc.subjectGoodwillen
dc.subject.ddc657en
dc.subject.classificationjelM41en
dc.titleTowards an Understanding of the Phases of Goodwill Accounting in Four Western Capitalist Countries: From Stakeholder Model to Shareholder Modelen
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstractenThe objective of this paper is to illustrate that the change in shareholders' attitude towards firms (from stakeholder model to shareholder model) influences the accounting treatments of goodwill. Our study is based on four countries (Great Britain, the United States, Germany, and France) and covers more than a century, starting in 1880. We explain that all these countries have gone through four identified phases of goodwill accounting, classified as (1) “static” (immediate or rapid expensing), (2) “weakened static” (write-off against equity), (3) “dynamic” (recognition with amortization over a long period) and (4) “actuarial” (recognition without amortization but with impairment if necessary). We contribute several new features to the existing literature on goodwill: our study (1) is international and comparative, (2) spans more than a century, (3) uses the stakeholder/shareholder models to explain the evolution in goodwill treatment in the four countries studied. More precisely, it relates a balance sheet theory, which distinguishes four phases in accounting treatment for goodwill, to the shift from a stakeholder model to a shareholder model, which leads to the preference for short-term rather than long-term profit, (4) contributes to the debate on whether accounting rules simply reflect or arguably help to produce the general trend towards the shareholder model, (5) demonstrates a “one-way” evolution of goodwill treatment in the four countries studied, towards the actuarial phase.en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameAccounting, Organizations and Society
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol33en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue7-8en
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2008-01
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages718-755en
dc.relation.isversionofdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.07.002
dc.identifier.urlsitehttp://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00366038/en/en
dc.description.sponsorshipprivateouien
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherElsevieren
dc.subject.ddclabelContrôle de gestion - Comptabilitéen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record