Einstein, Heinsenberg, Kant : methodological distinction and conditions of possibilities
Monod, Emmanuel (2004), Einstein, Heinsenberg, Kant : methodological distinction and conditions of possibilities, Information and Organization, 14, 2, p. 105-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2003.12.001
Type
Article accepté pour publication ou publiéDate
2004-04Journal name
Information and OrganizationVolume
14Number
2Publisher
Pergamon
Pages
105-121
Publication identifier
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor(s)
Monod, EmmanuelAbstract (FR)
The concepts of objectivity and causality, as they are used in general in IS research, and in particular in critical realism, are no longer valid in Physics. Therefore, IS research should consider the “copernician revolution” that happened in Physics and in other sciences. Bhor, Heisenberg and Einstein themselves refer to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. The two fundamental concepts are therefore no more objectivity and causality, but the “methodological distinction” and the “conditions of possibilities”. This kantian framework, commonly used by other human and social sciences, like sociology or history, indicates a way for an epistemological pluralism in IS research.Subjects / Keywords
Épistémologie; Méthodologie; Sciences socialesJEL
Z19 - OtherRelated items
Showing items related by title and author.
-
Lepic, Sabine (2017-12-07) Thèse
-
Boland, Dick; Monod, Emmanuel (2007-01) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
-
Monod, Emmanuel (2004) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
-
Monod, Emmanuel (2004) Communication / Conférence
-
Monod, Emmanuel; Watson, Richard (2003-09) Article accepté pour publication ou publié