Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
Airiau, Stéphane; Bonzon, Elise; Endriss, Ulle; Maudet, Nicolas; Rossit, Julien (2016-05), Rationalisation of Profiles of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks, in Thangarajah, John; Tuyls, Karl; Jonker, Catholijn M.; Marsella, Stacy, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2016), IFAAMAS, p. 350-357
Type
Communication / ConférenceDate
2016-05Conference title
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2016)Conference date
2016-05Conference city
SingaporeConference country
SingaporeBook title
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2016)Book author
Thangarajah, John; Tuyls, Karl; Jonker, Catholijn M.; Marsella, StacyPublisher
IFAAMAS
ISBN
978-1-4503-4239-1
Number of pages
1537Pages
350-357
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor(s)
Airiau, Stéphane
Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision [LAMSADE]
Bonzon, Elise
Laboratoire d'Informatique Paris Descartes [LIPADE - EA 2517]
Endriss, Ulle
Institute for Logic, Language and Computation [ILLC]
Maudet, Nicolas

Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris 6 [LIP6]
Rossit, Julien
Laboratoire d'Informatique Paris Descartes [LIPADE - EA 2517]
Abstract (EN)
Different agents may have different points of view. This can be modelled using different abstract argumentation frameworks, each consisting of a set of arguments and a binary attack-relation between them. A question arising in this context is whether the diversity of views observed in such a profile of argumentation frameworks is consistent with the assumption that every individual argumentation framework is induced by a combination of, first, some basic factual attack-relation between the arguments and, second, the personal preferences of the agent concerned. We treat this question of rationalisability of a profile as an algorithmic problem and identify tractable and intractable cases. This is useful for understanding what types of profiles can reasonably be expected to come up in a multiagent system.Subjects / Keywords
Argumentation; Social Choice TheoryRelated items
Showing items related by title and author.
-
Airiau, Stéphane; Bonzon, Elise; Endriss, Ulle; Maudet, Nicolas; Rossit, Julien (2017) Communication / Conférence
-
Airiau, Stéphane; Bonzon, Elise; Endriss, Ulle; Maudet, Nicolas; Rossit, Julien (2017) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
-
Bonzon, Elise; Maudet, Nicolas; Moretti, Stefano (2014) Communication / Conférence
-
Estivie, Sylvia; Chevaleyre, Yann; Endriss, Ulle; Maudet, Nicolas (2006) Communication / Conférence
-
Endriss, Ulle; Maudet, Nicolas (2004) Communication / Conférence