Show simple item record

Ambiguity in problem framing as a barrier to collective actions: some hints from groundwater protection policy in the Apulia Region

dc.contributor.authorBrugnach, Marcela
dc.contributor.authorGiordano, Raffaele
dc.contributor.authorPluchinotta, Irene
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-08T16:03:51Z
dc.date.available2017-02-08T16:03:51Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0926-2644
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/16237
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectProblem framing
dc.subjectAmbiguity analysis
dc.subjectPolicy analysis
dc.subjectCausal Loop Diagram
dc.subject.ddc003; 333en
dc.subject.classificationjelQ.Q2.Q25en
dc.titleAmbiguity in problem framing as a barrier to collective actions: some hints from groundwater protection policy in the Apulia Region
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.contributor.editoruniversityotherUniversity of Twente
dc.contributor.editoruniversityotherCNR-IRSA
dc.description.abstractenDifferences in problem framing and understanding are unavoidable in multi-actor decision-making processes, deeming ambiguous problem definitions and actions. The presence of ambiguity may have diverse implications. On the one hand, a diversity in frames can enhance the co-production of knowledge offering opportunities for innovative solutions. On the other hand, the presence of ambiguity can be a source of discrepancies or conflict in a group, hampering the implementation and/or reducing the effectiveness of environmental policy. This work demonstrates that neglecting ambiguity in problem framing leads decision-actors to simplify the interaction space by ignoring the role of some of the other decision-actors and/or making wrong assumptions about their mental models. Moreover, they act as if the system is as simple as the decision-actors presume it to be. To demonstrate these hypotheses, a Causal Loop Diagram method was implemented to investigate the policy resistance mechanisms hampering the implementation of sustainable groundwater abstraction policy in the Apulia Region (Southern Italy).
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameGroup Decision and Negotiation
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2016
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages1-22
dc.relation.isversionofdoi10.1007/s10726-016-9519-1
dc.contributor.countryeditoruniversityotherNETHERLANDS
dc.contributor.countryeditoruniversityotherITALY
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherKluwer Academic Publishers
dc.subject.ddclabelRecherche opérationnelle; Economie de la terre et des ressources naturellesen
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.relation.forthcomingprintnonen
dc.description.ssrncandidatenon
dc.description.halcandidateoui
dc.description.readershiprecherche
dc.description.audienceInternational
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewedoui
dc.date.updated2017-02-20T17:28:05Z
hal.identifierhal-01462186*
hal.version1*
hal.faultCodeThe supplied format packaging is not supported by the server
hal.update.actionupdateMetadata*
hal.update.actionupdateFiles*


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record