dc.contributor.author | Monod, Emmanuel | |
dc.contributor.author | Watson, Richard | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-09-18T10:28:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-09-18T10:28:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003-09 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/1762 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Association of Information Systems Planning | en |
dc.subject | Planning method | en |
dc.subject | Stakeholder analysis | en |
dc.subject | Service matrix analysis | en |
dc.subject | Missions matrix analysis | en |
dc.subject | Planification stratégique | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 658.4 | en |
dc.subject.classificationjel | L1 | en |
dc.title | Tools and techniques for AIS Strategic Planning | en |
dc.type | Article accepté pour publication ou publié | |
dc.contributor.editoruniversityother | University of Georgia;États-Unis | |
dc.description.abstracten | AIS went through and will continue to undergo evolution and revolution as it grows. This article
analyzes the current state of AIS and concludes it is in or approaching a crisis of priorities.
Planning is the recommended path for solving this crisis. Four planning methods are proposed:
stakeholder analysis, service matrix analysis, missions matrix analysis, and a four-year budget
cycle.
Keywords: AIS, planning, planning methods, priority setting, stakeholder analysis, service matrix
analysis, missions matrix analysis, budget cycle | en |
dc.relation.isversionofjnlname | Communications of the Association for Information Systems (CAIS) | |
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol | 12 | en |
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue | 7 | en |
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate | 2003-09 | |
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages | 119-126 | en |
dc.description.sponsorshipprivate | oui | en |
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisher | Association for Information Systems | en |
dc.subject.ddclabel | Direction d'entreprise | en |