Show simple item record

hal.structure.identifierInstitut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Sciences Sociales [IRISSO]
dc.contributor.authorMontagne, Sabine
HAL ID: 9635
ORCID: 0000-0003-4025-0170
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-28T09:06:36Z
dc.date.available2019-11-28T09:06:36Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/20275
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectlegal standardsen
dc.subject.ddc306.3en
dc.titleWhat social sciences can tell about the production of legal standards?: The Case of the Standard of Prudenceen
dc.typeCommunication / Conférence
dc.description.abstractenLegal standards are strange objects: both legal instruments, referring to the legal normativity, and socio-professional norms, referring to the collective elaboration of commonly accepted rules. As legal instruments, they have been studied by law scholars (Roscoe Pound has founded a long tradition for academic contributions). The point of my contribution is to explore other positions of research, from institutional economics, economic sociology, political science, able to develop useful insights for understanding the production of legal standards. I propose to show the heuristic of using, simultaneously, several of these positions for studying one standard. In order to illustrate this heuristic, my contribution is based on a particular standard, the fiduciary standard of prudence imposed to trustees in the US.By contrast with the legal study which is interested by the intrinsic and general features and “qualities” of the legal standard, these approaches do not focus on the substance but on the processes that generate it : on the particular economic situations and social process that “produce” a standard and, reciprocally, on the situations the standard produces. Social sciences offer four principles for grasping these situations: 1) analytic (used by mainstream economics and structuralism) which consists in stylizing economic interactions; 2) genetic (used by institutional economics, historical sociology, political science) which consists in tracing the history of these economic interactions; 3) pragmatic (used by these disciplines) which focuses on reciprocity of the interactions in general; 4) interactionist which focuses on the interactions in particular legal cases.en
dc.subject.ddclabelSociologie économiqueen
dc.relation.conftitle23rd SASE Conference, Universidad Autonoma de Madriden
dc.relation.confdate2011-07
dc.relation.confcityMadriden
dc.relation.confcountrySpainen
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.description.ssrncandidatenonen
dc.description.halcandidateouien
dc.description.readershiprechercheen
dc.description.audienceInternationalen
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewednonen
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewednonen
dc.date.updated2019-11-25T08:33:01Z
hal.identifierhal-02383936*
hal.version1*
hal.author.functionaut


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record