Show simple item record

hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire d'Economie de Dauphine [LEDa]
dc.contributor.authorCalvo, Thomas
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire d'Economie de Dauphine [LEDa]
dc.contributor.authorLavallée, Emmanuelle
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire d'Economie de Dauphine [LEDa]
dc.contributor.authorRazafindrakoto, Mireille
hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire d'Economie de Dauphine [LEDa]
dc.contributor.authorRoubaud, François
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-21T10:58:06Z
dc.date.available2020-01-21T10:58:06Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0147-5967
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/20456
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectSocial capital
dc.subjectConflict
dc.subjectParticipation
dc.subjectTrust
dc.subjectMali
dc.subjectD71
dc.subjectF51
dc.subjectO12
dc.subjectZ13
dc.subject.ddc338.9en
dc.subject.classificationjelZ.Z1.Z13en
dc.subject.classificationjelO.O1.O12en
dc.subject.classificationjelF.F5.F51en
dc.subject.classificationjelD.D7.D71en
dc.titleFear Not For Man? Armed conflict and social capital in Mali
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstractenThis paper studies the effects of armed conflict on social capital in Mali, where a violent conflict has been raging since 2012. We examine the conflict’s impacts on associational membership using event location data and unique survey data on governance, peace and security (GPS-SHaSA). We show that, in conflict-exposed areas, adult involvement in associations increases from 7 to 14 percentage points. Instrumental variable and difference-in-differences strategies complementary mitigate reverse causation and omitted variable biases as estimated results remain very consistent. Robust estimations constrained to non-migrants samples also rule out selection into migration. Yet this result, consistent with the argument that armed conflict cultivates social engagement, is not a positive outcome in the case of Mali. The increase is observed solely for family and political associations, which are comparatively inward-looking and act as interest groups. We interpret this finding as a form of withdrawal behind group or community boundaries, an interpretation supported by further analysis of interpersonal trust. This sort of withdrawal may exacerbate ethnic divisions and deepen the conflict.
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameJournal of Comparative Economics
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol48
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue2
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2020
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages251-276
dc.relation.isversionofdoi10.1016/j.jce.2019.11.005
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherElsevier
dc.subject.ddclabelCroissance et développement économiquesen
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.relation.forthcomingprintnonen
dc.description.ssrncandidatenon
dc.description.halcandidateoui
dc.description.readershiprecherche
dc.description.audienceInternational
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewedoui
dc.date.updated2023-03-16T10:14:27Z
hal.identifierhal-02446972*
hal.version1*
hal.update.actionupdateFiles*
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record