Show simple item record

hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire d'Economie de Dauphine [LEDa]
dc.contributor.authorGueye, Mamadou
HAL ID: 174100
hal.structure.identifierCentre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - FRE2010 [CEE-M]
hal.structure.identifierCentre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - UMR 5211 [CEE-M]
dc.contributor.authorQuérou, Nicolas
HAL ID: 172454
ORCID: 0000-0001-9668-1194
hal.structure.identifierCentre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - FRE2010 [CEE-M]
hal.structure.identifierCentre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - UMR 5211 [CEE-M]
dc.contributor.authorSoubeyran, Raphael
HAL ID: 170254
ORCID: 0000-0002-7334-4555
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-15T12:06:22Z
dc.date.available2020-04-15T12:06:22Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0167-2681
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/20645
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectCoordination gameen
dc.subjectInequalityen
dc.subjectInequality aversionen
dc.subjectTotal payoff motivationen
dc.subject.ddc338.5en
dc.subject.classificationjelD.D7.D70en
dc.subject.classificationjelD.D6.D63en
dc.subject.classificationjelC.C9.C99en
dc.titleSocial preferences and coordination: An experimenten
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstractenIn this paper, we use a laboratory experiment to analyze the effect of social preferences in a coordination game with Pareto-ranked equilibria. Inequality is increased by increasing the coordination payoffs of some subjects while the coordination payoffs of others remain unchanged. Theoretically, in this setting, inequality aversion may lead to a negative relationship between inequality and coordination success, while total payoff motivations lead to a positive relationship. Using a within-subject experimental design, we find that more inequality unambiguously yields a higher level of coordination success. Furthermore, this result holds even for subjects whose payoffs remain unchanged. Our results suggest that total payoff motivations drive the positive relationship between inequality and coordination success found in this experiment. Moreover, our data highlight that the order of treatment matters. Groups facing over time a reduction in inequalities reach the efficient outcome more often, over the entire experiment, compared to groups facing over time an increase in inequalities. This study thus contributes to understanding whether social preferences and variations in inequality affect the outcome of coordination problems.en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol173en
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2020-05
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages26-54en
dc.relation.isversionofdoi10.1016/j.jebo.2020.02.017en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherElsevieren
dc.subject.ddclabelMicroéconomieen
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.relation.forthcomingprintnonen
dc.description.ssrncandidatenonen
dc.description.halcandidateouien
dc.description.readershiprechercheen
dc.description.audienceInternationalen
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewedouien
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewedouien
dc.date.updated2020-04-15T10:05:26Z
hal.faultCode{"duplicate-entry":{"hal-02507100":{"doi":"1.0"}}}
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record