Show simple item record

"Do as I say, not as I do": the emergence of a peacebuilding organization and its struggle with conflicts

hal.structure.identifierDauphine Recherches en Management [DRM]
dc.contributor.authorAdrot, Anouck
hal.structure.identifier
dc.contributor.authorSalzman, Anne
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-28T09:03:01Z
dc.date.available2020-05-28T09:03:01Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/20791
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectConflict responseen
dc.subjectOrganizational conflicten
dc.subjectgroup dynamicsen
dc.subject.ddc303en
dc.subject.classificationjelD.D7.D74en
dc.title"Do as I say, not as I do": the emergence of a peacebuilding organization and its struggle with conflictsen
dc.typeCommunication / Conférence
dc.description.abstractenThe development of social capabilities to prevent conflicts is more than ever needed. In line with such interest, emerging initiatives for peacebuilding have multiplied in the latest years. However, organizational emergence in relation to peacebuilding remains an overlooked topic in management. Both professionals and scholars lack feedback regarding the chances of survival of this type of initiative, as well as how to support it. This research in progress relies on a "reflection-in-action" longitudinal design and employs collaborative autoethnography practices to understand the dynamics inherent to organizational emergence in relation to peace building. Our analysis reveals the conflictual nature of the emergence of an organization devoted to the conception and production of a game aiming at promoting peaceful resolution of conflicts. More specifically, it identifies three major vectors of peacebuilding organizational emergence, namely 'affective ties', 'pragmatic bounds' and existential meaning'. Each of these vectors has been playing a significant role into the development of the properties of the peacebuilding organization, but also generated important conflicts between the organization and its environment. We discuss how this inherent paradox should be taken into account in peacebuilding policy as well as the benefit from a "reflection-in-action" approach to peacebuilding.en
dc.subject.ddclabelConflits sociauxen
dc.relation.conftitle35th EGOS Colloquiumen
dc.relation.confdate2019-07
dc.relation.confcityEdimburghen
dc.relation.confcountryUnited Kingdomen
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.description.ssrncandidatenonen
dc.description.halcandidateouien
dc.description.readershiprechercheen
dc.description.audienceInternationalen
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewednonen
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewednonen
dc.date.updated2020-05-27T09:50:06Z
hal.identifierhal-02638893*
hal.version1*
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record