Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOzkes, Ali Ihsan
dc.contributor.authorSanver, Remzi
HAL ID: 184266
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T10:54:56Z
dc.date.available2020-09-30T10:54:56Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/21024
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectPareto optimality
dc.subjectneutrality
dc.subjectanonymity
dc.subjectsocial choice functions
dc.subject.ddc515en
dc.titleProcedural versus Opportunity-Wise Equal Treatment of Alternatives: Neutrality Revisited
dc.typeDocument de travail / Working paper
dc.description.abstractenWe revisit the neutrality requirement in social choice theory. We propose a weakening of the standard neutrality condition, by allowing for different procedural treatment for different alternatives while entailing that alternatives enjoy same ex-ante possibility to be chosen. We compare these two conditions theoretically and computationally. Furthermore, we explore social choice problems in which this weakening resolves impossibilities that stem from a fundamental tension between neutrality and anonymity. Finally, we show that in certain social choice problems, this weakening provides an immediate refinement of anonymous, neutral, and Pareto optimal social choice rules towards retaining resoluteness.
dc.publisher.cityParisen
dc.relation.ispartofseriestitlePreprint Lamsade
dc.identifier.urlsitehttps://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01613138
dc.subject.ddclabelAnalyseen
dc.description.ssrncandidatenon
dc.description.halcandidatenon
dc.description.readershiprecherche
dc.description.audienceInternational
dc.date.updated2020-12-17T09:10:58Z


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record