• xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.header.title
    • français
    • English
  • Help
  • Login
  • Language 
    • Français
    • English
View Item 
  •   BIRD Home
  • LAMSADE (UMR CNRS 7243)
  • LAMSADE : Publications
  • View Item
  •   BIRD Home
  • LAMSADE (UMR CNRS 7243)
  • LAMSADE : Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

BIRDResearch centres & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesTypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesType

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors
Thumbnail - Request a copy

Decision-Aid and Expected Utility Theory: A Critical Survey

Bouyssou, Denis (1984), Decision-Aid and Expected Utility Theory: A Critical Survey, in Hagen, Ole; Wenstøp, Fred, Progress in Utility and Risk Theory, Springer, p. 181-216. 10.1007/978-94-009-6351-1_6

Type
Chapitre d'ouvrage
Date
1984
Book title
Progress in Utility and Risk Theory
Book author
Hagen, Ole; Wenstøp, Fred
Publisher
Springer
ISBN
978-94-009-6351-1
Number of pages
279
Pages
181-216
Publication identifier
10.1007/978-94-009-6351-1_6
Metadata
Show full item record
Author(s)
Bouyssou, Denis cc
Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision [LAMSADE]
Abstract (EN)
Expected utility theory can be viewed in two different ways. First, as a formal mathematical theory providing representation and uniqueness theorems for preference structures. Secondly, as a decision-aid model, seemingly resting on the formal theory and which emerged in the late 50’s : what I will call decision analysis. It is not easy from a historical point of view to understand how a purely formal theory designed to handle mixed strategies in Game Theory gave rise to a decision-aid model. Nevertheless the best-known argument in favour of decision analysis is that it is logically sound and axiomatically based. The aim of this paper is to investigate the links between these two levels, in order to clarify the way the decision-aid model works in practice. After a brief description of the main features of the formal model, I will try to see to what extent the decision-aid model is based on it and how it actually works. In the last section, I will review empirical studies dealing with the decision-aid model.
Subjects / Keywords
Utility Function; Preference Relation; Decision Analysis; Basic Attitude; Stochastic Dominance

Related items

Showing items related by title and author.

  • Thumbnail
    Comparison of two decision-aid models applied to a nuclear power plant siting example 
    Roy, Bernard; Bouyssou, Denis (1986) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Thumbnail
    Subjective expected utility without preferences 
    Bouyssou, Denis; Marchant, Thierry (2011) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Thumbnail
    Evaluation and decision models: a critical perspective 
    Bouyssou, Denis; Marchant, Thierry; Pirlot, Marc; Perny, Patrice; Tsoukiàs, Alexis; Vincke, Philippe (2000) Ouvrage
  • Thumbnail
    Decision-aid and decision-making 
    Roy, Bernard (1990) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Thumbnail
    Annales du LAMSADE - Proceedings of the DIMACS –LAMSADE Workshop on Computer Science and Decision Theory Paris, 27–29 October 2004 
    Bouyssou, Denis; Janowitz, Melvin F.; Roberts, Fred; Tsoukiàs, Alexis (2004) Ouvrage
Dauphine PSL Bibliothèque logo
Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Phone: 01 44 05 40 94
Contact
Dauphine PSL logoEQUIS logoCreative Commons logo