Adapting participatory processes to fine‐tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings
Buchs, Arnaud; Hassenforder, Emeline; Meinard, Yves (2019), Adapting participatory processes to fine‐tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings, Conservation Biology, 35, 3, p. 804-815. 10.1111/cobi.13654
TypeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
Journal nameConservation Biology
MetadataShow full item record
Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision [LAMSADE]
Abstract (EN)Conservation decisions are typically made in complex, dynamic, and uncertain settings, where multiple actors raise diverse and potentially conflicting claims, champion different and sometimes contradictory values, and enjoy varying degrees of freedom and power to act and influence collective decisions. Therefore, effective conservation actions require conservation scientists and practitioners to take into account the complexity of multiactor settings. We devised a framework to help conservation biologists and practitioners in this task. Institutional economic theories, which are insufficiently cited in the conservation literature, contain useful insights for conservation. Among these theories, the economies of worth can significantly contribute to conservation because it can be used to classify the types of values peoples or groups refer to when they interact during the elaboration and implementation of conservation projects. Refining this approach, we designed a framework to help conservation professionals grasp the relevant differences among settings in which decisions related to conservation actions are to be made, so that they can adapt their approaches to the features of the settings they encounter. This framework distinguishes 6 types of agreements and disagreements that can occur between actors involved in a conservation project (harmony, stricto sensu arrangement, deliberated arrangement, unilateral and reciprocal compromise, and locked‐in), depending on whether they disagree on values or on their applications and on whether they can converge toward common values by working together. We identified key questions that conservationists should answer to adapt their strategy to the disagreements they encounter and identified relevant participatory processes to complete the adaptation.
Subjects / Keywordsdecision making; deliberation; institutional economics; justification; participation; value pluralism; conservation action
Showing items related by title and author.
How AI could help physicians during their medical consultations: An analysis of physicians' decision process to develop efficient decision support systems for medical consultations Richard, Antoine; Mayag, Brice; Meinard, Yves; Talbot, François; Tsoukiàs, Alexis (2018) Communication / Conférence
A meta-decision-analysis approach to structure operational and legitimate environmental policies - With an application to wetland prioritization Choulak, Mourad; Marage, Damien; Gisbert, Manon; Paris, Mélanie; Meinard, Yves (2019) Article accepté pour publication ou publié