Show simple item record

On the Impact of Public Housing on Income Segregation in France

hal.structure.identifierLaboratoire d'Economie de Dauphine [LEDa]
dc.contributor.authorBeaubrun-Diant, Kevin
hal.structure.identifierEDHEC Economics Research Centre
hal.structure.identifier
hal.structure.identifierResearch Center on Economics
dc.contributor.authorMaury, Tristan-Pierre
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-26T08:55:03Z
dc.date.available2023-01-26T08:55:03Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0070-3370
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.psl.eu/handle/123456789/23831
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectIncome segregationen
dc.subjectPublic housingen
dc.subjectSpatial decompositionen
dc.subjectPovertyen
dc.subjectHome tenureen
dc.subject.ddc338.5en
dc.subject.classificationjelI.I3.I32en
dc.subject.classificationjelD.D3.D31en
dc.subject.classificationjelD.D6.D63en
dc.titleOn the Impact of Public Housing on Income Segregation in Franceen
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstractenThis article provides a geographic analysis of the contribution of public housing to income segregation in France from 1999 to 2015. The analysis is conducted with several segregation indices and at different geographic scales. Surprisingly, it appears that while home tenure (public vs. private housing) segregation has been decreasing, income segregation has been rising. With segregation decomposition techniques, we provide evidence that this is partly due to an increasing concentration of low-income households in public housing, which cancels out the effect of the spatial dispersion of public housing. Indeed, while public housing has become more homogeneously distributed geographically, which should help to reduce income segregation, the distribution of income within public (and private) housing has changed: households living in public housing were poorer in 2015 than in 1999. We also provide evidence of a sorting effect—the process of allocating public housing that is not random—so that the richest neighborhoods or municipalities receive wealthier-than-average public tenants.en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameDemography
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol59en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue2en
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2022-04
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages685–706en
dc.relation.isversionofdoi10.1215/00703370-9807596en
dc.identifier.urlsitehttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48687274en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherSpringeren
dc.subject.ddclabelMicroéconomieen
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.description.ssrncandidatenon
dc.description.halcandidateouien
dc.description.readershipnon-rechercheen
dc.description.audienceInternationalen
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewedouien
dc.date.updated2023-01-12T14:59:53Z
hal.identifierhal-03957214
hal.version1
dc.subject.classificationjelHALI - Health, Education, and Welfare::I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty::I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Povertyen
dc.subject.classificationjelHALD - Microeconomics::D3 - Distribution::D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributionsen
dc.subject.classificationjelHALD - Microeconomics::D6 - Welfare Economics::D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurementen
hal.date.transferred2023-01-26T08:55:12Z
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record