• xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.header.title
    • français
    • English
  • Aide
  • Connexion
  • Langue 
    • Français
    • English
Consulter le document 
  •   Accueil
  • LAMSADE (UMR CNRS 7243)
  • LAMSADE : Publications
  • Consulter le document
  •   Accueil
  • LAMSADE (UMR CNRS 7243)
  • LAMSADE : Publications
  • Consulter le document
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Afficher

Toute la baseCentres de recherche & CollectionsAnnée de publicationAuteurTitreTypeCette collectionAnnée de publicationAuteurTitreType

Mon compte

Connexion

Enregistrement

Statistiques

Documents les plus consultésStatistiques par paysAuteurs les plus consultés
Thumbnail - Request a copy

Implementing a Public Transport Line: Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods that Facilitate Concertation

Diab, Youssef; Roy, Bernard; Labbouz, Sophie; Christen, Michel (2008), Implementing a Public Transport Line: Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods that Facilitate Concertation, Operational Research, 1, 8, p. 5-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12351-008-0003-9

Type
Article accepté pour publication ou publié
Date
2008
Nom de la revue
Operational Research
Volume
1
Numéro
8
Éditeur
Springer
Pages
5-31
Identifiant publication
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12351-008-0003-9
Métadonnées
Afficher la notice complète
Auteur(s)
Diab, Youssef
Roy, Bernard
Labbouz, Sophie
Christen, Michel
Résumé (EN)
Since the 1980s, when the city of Nantes set up its tram system, tramways and segregated lanes for buses have been thriving in French metropolitan areas, while public transportation has been expanding. The layout of the lines within a city and the introduction of the transportation platform into the public space are the result of the tradeoffs made between the technical stakes of the project and the local stakeholders’ expectations. In this article, we propose a methodology that facilitates a process of concertation involving reasoned public discourse (the French word “Concertation” does not have any real equivalent in English. It designates a participative decision-making process in which the various stakeholders are able to express their point of view and have it taken into account in the decision-making process). This methodology, based on historical research about past transportation projects, uses multi-criteria decision-making methods to reach a compromise between the technical stakes and local expectations.
Mots-clés
Public transport; Multi-criteria decision-making methods; Urban planning; Debate; Concertation

Publications associées

Affichage des éléments liés par titre et auteur.

  • Vignette de prévisualisation
    Integrated micro-economic modelling and multi-criteria methodology to support public decision-making: the case of liquid bio-fuels in France 
    Rozakis, Stelios; Sourie, Jean-Claude; Vanderpooten, Daniel (2001) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Vignette de prévisualisation
    Limitations of cost benefit analysis to support public debate: the case of public transportation decision-making in France 
    Damart, Sébastien; Roy, Bernard (2007) Document de travail / Working paper
  • Vignette de prévisualisation
    The uses of cost–benefit analysis in public transportation decision-making in France 
    Damart, Sébastien; Roy, Bernard (2009) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Vignette de prévisualisation
    Robustness in Multi-Criteria Decision Aiding 
    Aissi, Hassene; Roy, Bernard (2010) Chapitre d'ouvrage
  • Vignette de prévisualisation
    Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method 
    Jacquet-Lagreze, Eric; Siskos, Jean (1982) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
Dauphine PSL Bibliothèque logo
Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Tél. : 01 44 05 40 94
Contact
Dauphine PSL logoEQUIS logoCreative Commons logo