Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLin, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorRamond, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorCasta, Jean-François
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-18T11:45:09Z
dc.date.available2010-02-18T11:45:09Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/3507
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectValue-relevance
dc.subjectperformance reporting
dc.subjectother comprehensive income
dc.subjectcomprehensive income
dc.subjectsummary accounting income
dc.subjectIASB / FASB joint project
dc.subject.ddc657en
dc.subject.classificationjelG31en
dc.subject.classificationjelG12en
dc.subject.classificationjelM41en
dc.titleValue Relevance of Summary Accounting Income Measures: Evidence from Major European Capital Markets
dc.typeCommunication / Conférence
dc.description.abstractenThis study investigates the extent to which three key summary accounting income figures,namely operating income (OPI), net income (NI) and comprehensive income (CI), providevalue-relevant information to investors in major EU capital markets. Using a large sampleover the pre-IAS-compliance period (1992-2004), we find that all these three figures arestatistically associated with share returns in any of the countries under analysis althoughdisparities in the degree of ‘usefulness’ appear across samples. Our main results are thenthreefold. We first provide evidence that CI is less value-relevant than both NI and OPI in allthe sample countries. Second, our results show that aggregate OCI is value-relevant andgenerally provides incremental price-relevant information beyond NI. This finding is ratherdifferent from the existing US literature that suggests OCI is usually not value-relevantespecially when not separately disclosed in financial statements. Finally, considering earlyadoption firms, we find that increased transparency on reporting OCI as required by the UKFRS3 and US SFAS130 standards may have warranted a stronger statistical associationbetween share returns and CI. This last finding therefore strongly supports the ideologyunderlying the IASB/FASB ‘Performance Reporting’ joint project, and provides evidencesupporting Beaver’s (1981) psychology-based financial reporting theory.
dc.identifier.citationpages60
dc.relation.ispartoftitle29ème congrès de l’AFC (Association Francophone de Comptabilité )
dc.relation.ispartofpublnameAssociation francophone de comptabilité
dc.description.sponsorshipprivateouien
dc.subject.ddclabelContrôle de gestion Comptabilitéen
dc.relation.conftitle29ème congrès de l’AFC (Association Francophone de Comptabilité )
dc.relation.confdate2008
dc.relation.confcityCergy
dc.relation.confcountryFRANCE
dc.description.ssrncandidatenon
dc.description.halcandidateoui
dc.description.readershiprecherche
dc.description.audienceInternational
dc.date.updated2023-06-29T23:06:12Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record