• xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.header.title
    • français
    • English
  • Aide
  • Connexion
  • Langue 
    • Français
    • English
Consulter le document 
  •   Accueil
  • DRM (UMR CNRS 7088)
  • DRM : Publications
  • Consulter le document
  •   Accueil
  • DRM (UMR CNRS 7088)
  • DRM : Publications
  • Consulter le document
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Afficher

Toute la baseCentres de recherche & CollectionsAnnée de publicationAuteurTitreTypeCette collectionAnnée de publicationAuteurTitreType

Mon compte

Connexion

Enregistrement

Statistiques

Documents les plus consultésStatistiques par paysAuteurs les plus consultés
Thumbnail

Explaining the Cross-Section of Stock Returns in France : Characteristics or Risk Factors?

Lajili, Souad (2007), Explaining the Cross-Section of Stock Returns in France : Characteristics or Risk Factors?, The European Journal of Finance, 13, 2, p. 145-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518470600813557

Voir/Ouvrir
cereg200305.pdf (341.0Kb)
Type
Article accepté pour publication ou publié
Date
2007
Nom de la revue
The European Journal of Finance
Volume
13
Numéro
2
Éditeur
Taylor & Francis
Pages
145-158
Identifiant publication
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518470600813557
Métadonnées
Afficher la notice complète
Auteur(s)
Lajili, Souad
Résumé (EN)
In this study, we test the three factor model of Fama and French and the Characteristic Model of Daniel and Titman (1997) on The French Stock Market over July 1976 to June 2001 period. Stocks are ranked by size and book to market ratios and then by ex-ante HML, SMB or Mkt loadings. The characteristic-based model predicts that these portfolios should have an average return of zero.While, the factor model says that these returns should be positive. Our results reject the factor model with characteristic balanced portfolios that load on the HML, SMB and MKt factors. Moreover, the three factor model predicts that the intercepts of regressions of the returns of these characteristicbalanced portfolios on the Fama and French factor portfolios are indistinguishable from zero. In contrast, the alternative hypothesis of the characteristic model says that these intercepts should be negative. Our results are consistent with the factor pricing model and inconsistent with the characteristic-based pricing model. Because the size and the value premiums are relatively small, our conclusions must be interpreted carefully. In contrast, market premium allows more powerful tests of the two models.
Mots-clés
Risk factors; Fama and French Unconditional Model; Asset Pricing
JEL
G11 - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
G12 - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
C13 - Estimation: General

Publications associées

Affichage des éléments liés par titre et auteur.

  • Vignette de prévisualisation
    Size and book to market effects vs co-skweness and co-kurtosis in explaining stock returns 
    Lajili, Souad (2005) Communication / Conférence
  • Vignette de prévisualisation
    The capital asset pricing model and the three factor model of Fama and French revisited in the case of France 
    Lajili, Souad (2002) Document de travail / Working paper
  • Vignette de prévisualisation
    The number of securities giving the maximum return in the presence of transaction costs 
    Lajili, Souad; Rakotondratsimba, Yves (2008) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Vignette de prévisualisation
    Hedge Fund Returns and Factor Models : A Cross-Section Approach 
    Darolles, Serge; Mero, Gulten (2011-05) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Vignette de prévisualisation
    The “Risk-Free” Rate of Return in the Politics of Global Finance: The State As Financial Asset, Foundation of Value and Sovereign on Behalf of Creditors 
    Ortiz, Horacio (2018) Communication / Conférence
Dauphine PSL Bibliothèque logo
Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Tél. : 01 44 05 40 94
Contact
Dauphine PSL logoEQUIS logoCreative Commons logo