• xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.header.title
    • français
    • English
  • Help
  • Login
  • Language 
    • Français
    • English
View Item 
  •   BIRD Home
  • LAMSADE (UMR CNRS 7243)
  • LAMSADE : Publications
  • View Item
  •   BIRD Home
  • LAMSADE (UMR CNRS 7243)
  • LAMSADE : Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

BIRDResearch centres & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesTypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesType

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors
Thumbnail - Request a copy

Aggregation Problems and Models: What Comes First?

Pigozzi, Gabriella (2010), Aggregation Problems and Models: What Comes First?, in Stadler, Friedrich, The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science, Springer : Berlin, p. 141-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9115-4_11

Type
Chapitre d'ouvrage
Date
2010
Book title
The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science
Book author
Stadler, Friedrich
Publisher
Springer
Published in
Berlin
ISBN
978-90-481-9114-7
Pages
141-152
Publication identifier
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9115-4_11
Metadata
Show full item record
Author(s)
Pigozzi, Gabriella
Abstract (EN)
The aggregation of consistent individual judgments on logically interconnected propositions into a collective judgment on the same propositions has recently drawn attention in law, philosophy, economics and computer science. Despite the apparent simplicity of the problem, reasonable aggregation procedures, such as propositionwise majority voting, cannot ensure a consistent collective outcome. The literature on judgment aggregation has been influenced by earlier work in social choice theory. As preference aggregation investigated in social choice theory, judgment aggregation studies aggregation functions under specific conditions. These are derived from properties of the preference aggregation realm. In this paper we argue that judgment aggregation problems are intrinsically different from preference aggregation ones. Thus, imposing exogenous models and properties is detrimental to a deep understanding of the specificity of judgment aggregation.
Subjects / Keywords
aggregation methods; individual judgments; collective judgment; aggregation problems

Related items

Showing items related by title and author.

  • Thumbnail
    A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules, and their properties 
    Lang, Jérôme; Pigozzi, Gabriella; Slavkovik, Marija; van der Torre, Leendert; Vesic, Srdjan (2017) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Thumbnail
    Belief merging and judgment aggregation 
    Pigozzi, Gabriella (2015-07) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Thumbnail
    Mixing Dyadic and Deliberative Opinion Dynamics in an Agent-Based Model of Group Decision-Making 
    Butler, George; Pigozzi, Gabriella; Rouchier, Juliette (2019) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Thumbnail
    Introduction to Judgment Aggregation 
    Grossi, Davide; Pigozzi, Gabriella (2012) Communication / Conférence
  • Thumbnail
    The Logic of Group Decisions: Judgment Aggregation 
    Pigozzi, Gabriella (2015) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
Dauphine PSL Bibliothèque logo
Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Phone: 01 44 05 40 94
Contact
Dauphine PSL logoEQUIS logoCreative Commons logo