• xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.header.title
    • français
    • English
  • Help
  • Login
  • Language 
    • Français
    • English
View Item 
  •   BIRD Home
  • LAMSADE (UMR CNRS 7243)
  • LAMSADE : Publications
  • View Item
  •   BIRD Home
  • LAMSADE (UMR CNRS 7243)
  • LAMSADE : Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

BIRDResearch centres & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesTypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesType

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors
Thumbnail

Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent manner

Bouyssou, Denis; Marchant, Thierry (2011), Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent manner, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 9, p. 1761-1769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21544

View/Open
ranking_scientists.PDF (184.5Kb)
Type
Article accepté pour publication ou publié
Date
2011
Journal name
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Volume
62
Number
9
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons
Pages
1761-1769
Publication identifier
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21544
Metadata
Show full item record
Author(s)
Bouyssou, Denis cc
Marchant, Thierry
Abstract (EN)
The standard data that we use when computing bibliometric rankingsof scientists are just their publication/citation records, i.e., so many paperswith 0 citation, so many with 1 citation, so many with 2 citations, etc.The standard data for bibliometric rankings of departments have the samestructure. It is therefore tempting (and many authors gave in to temptation)to use the same method for computing rankings of scientists and rankingsof departments. Depending on the method, this can yield quite surpris-ing and unpleasant results. Indeed, with some methods, it may happenthat the \best" department contains the \worst" scientists, and only them.This problem will not occur if the rankings satisfy a property called consis-tency, recently introduced in the literature. In this paper, we explore theconsequences of consistency and we characterize two families of consistentrankings.
Subjects / Keywords
consistency; Ranking; bibliometrics

Related items

Showing items related by title and author.

  • Thumbnail
    Consistent bibliometric rankings of authors and of journals 
    Bouyssou, Denis; Marchant, Thierry (2010) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Thumbnail
    The β -ranking and the β -measure for directed networks: Axiomatic characterizations 
    Bouyssou, Denis; Thierry, Marchant (2018) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Thumbnail
    An axiomatic approach to bibliometric rankings and indices 
    Marchant, Thierry; Bouyssou, Denis (2014) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Thumbnail
    Bibliometric rankings of journals based on Impact Factors: An axiomatic approach 
    Bouyssou, Denis; Marchant, Thierry (2011) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Thumbnail
    Ranking authors using fractional counting of citations: An axiomatic approach 
    Bouyssou, Denis; Marchant, Thierry (2016) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
Dauphine PSL Bibliothèque logo
Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Phone: 01 44 05 40 94
Contact
Dauphine PSL logoEQUIS logoCreative Commons logo