
Manipulation in group argument evaluation
Podlaszewski, Mikolaj; Pigozzi, Gabriella; Caminada, Martin (2011), Manipulation in group argument evaluation, in Sonenberg, Liz; Stone, Peter; Yolum, Pınar; Tumer, Kagan, Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2011),, IFAAMAS, p. 1127-1128
View/ Open
Type
Communication / ConférenceDate
2011Conference title
AAMAS 2011Conference date
2011-05Conference city
TaipeiConference country
TaïwanBook title
Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2011),Book author
Sonenberg, Liz; Stone, Peter; Yolum, Pınar; Tumer, KaganPublisher
IFAAMAS
Number of pages
1294Pages
1127-1128
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract (EN)
Given an argumentation framework and a group of agents, the individuals may have divergent opinions on the status of the arguments. If the group needs to reach a common po- sition on the argumentation framework, the question is how the individual evaluations can be mapped into a collective one. This problem has been recently investigated in [1]. In this paper, we study under which conditions these operators are Pareto optimal and whether they are manipulable.Subjects / Keywords
Collective decision making; Argumentation; Judgment aggregation; Social choice theoryRelated items
Showing items related by title and author.
-
Caminada, Martin; Pigozzi, Gabriella; Podlaszewski, Mikolaj (2011) Communication / Conférence
-
Awad, Edmond; Caminada, Martin; Pigozzi, Gabriella; Podlaszewski, Mikolaj; Rahwan, Iyad (2017) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
-
Pigozzi, Gabriella; Caminada, Martin (2011) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
-
Pigozzi, Gabriella; Caminada, Martin; Podlaszewski, Mikolaj (2011) Communication / Conférence
-
Butler, George; Pigozzi, Gabriella; Rouchier, Juliette (2019) Article accepté pour publication ou publié