Thumbnail

Manipulation in group argument evaluation

Podlaszewski, Mikolaj; Pigozzi, Gabriella; Caminada, Martin (2011), Manipulation in group argument evaluation, in Sonenberg, Liz; Stone, Peter; Yolum, Pınar; Tumer, Kagan, Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2011),, IFAAMAS, p. 1127-1128

View/Open
Type
Communication / Conférence
Date
2011
Conference title
AAMAS 2011
Conference date
2011-05
Conference city
Taipei
Conference country
Taïwan
Book title
Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2011),
Book author
Sonenberg, Liz; Stone, Peter; Yolum, Pınar; Tumer, Kagan
Publisher
IFAAMAS
Number of pages
1294
Pages
1127-1128
Metadata
Show full item record
Author(s)
Podlaszewski, Mikolaj
Pigozzi, Gabriella
Caminada, Martin
Abstract (EN)
Given an argumentation framework and a group of agents, the individuals may have divergent opinions on the status of the arguments. If the group needs to reach a common po- sition on the argumentation framework, the question is how the individual evaluations can be mapped into a collective one. This problem has been recently investigated in [1]. In this paper, we study under which conditions these operators are Pareto optimal and whether they are manipulable.
Subjects / Keywords
Collective decision making; Argumentation; Judgment aggregation; Social choice theory
JEL
C44 - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making