Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPodlaszewski, Mikolaj
dc.contributor.authorPigozzi, Gabriella
dc.contributor.authorCaminada, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-31T09:06:05Z
dc.date.available2011-08-31T09:06:05Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/6901
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectCollective decision makingen
dc.subjectArgumentationen
dc.subjectJudgment aggregationen
dc.subjectSocial choice theoryen
dc.subject.ddc003en
dc.subject.classificationjelC44en
dc.subject.classificationjelD7en
dc.titleManipulation in group argument evaluationen
dc.typeCommunication / Conférence
dc.contributor.editoruniversityotherIndividual and Collective Reasoning, University of Luxembourg;Luxembourg
dc.description.abstractenGiven an argumentation framework and a group of agents, the individuals may have divergent opinions on the status of the arguments. If the group needs to reach a common po- sition on the argumentation framework, the question is how the individual evaluations can be mapped into a collective one. This problem has been recently investigated in [1]. In this paper, we study under which conditions these operators are Pareto optimal and whether they are manipulable.en
dc.identifier.citationpages1127-1128en
dc.relation.ispartoftitleProceedings of 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2011),en
dc.relation.ispartofeditorSonenberg, Liz
dc.relation.ispartofeditorStone, Peter
dc.relation.ispartofeditorYolum, Pınar
dc.relation.ispartofeditorTumer, Kagan
dc.relation.ispartofpublnameIFAAMASen
dc.relation.ispartofdate2011
dc.relation.ispartofpages1294en
dc.description.sponsorshipprivateouien
dc.subject.ddclabelRecherche opérationnelleen
dc.relation.conftitleAAMAS 2011en
dc.relation.confdate2011-05
dc.relation.confcityTaipeien
dc.relation.confcountryTaïwanen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record