Show simple item record

A dynamic Ellsberg urn experiment

dc.contributor.authorDominiak, Adam
dc.contributor.authorDürsch, Peter
dc.contributor.authorLefort, Jean-Philippe
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T12:26:10Z
dc.date.available2011-10-26T12:26:10Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/7333
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectdynamic consistencyen
dc.subjectupdatingen
dc.subjectambiguityen
dc.subjectNon expected utility preferencesen
dc.subjectexperimenten
dc.subjectconsequentialismen
dc.subject.ddc338.5en
dc.subject.classificationjelD82
dc.subject.classificationjelD81en
dc.subject.classificationjelC91en
dc.titleA dynamic Ellsberg urn experimenten
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.contributor.editoruniversityotherUniversity of Heidelberg, Department of Economics;Allemagne
dc.description.abstractenMany theories of updating under ambiguity assume either dynamic consistency or consequentialism to underpin behaviorally the link between conditional and unconditional preferences. To test the descriptive validity of these rationality concepts, we conduct a dynamic extension of Ellsbergʼs 3-color experiment. We find that more subjects act in line with consequentialism than with dynamic consistency and that this result is even stronger among ambiguity averse subjects.en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameGames and Economic Behavior
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol75
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue2
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2012
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages625-638
dc.relation.isversionofdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.01.002
dc.description.sponsorshipprivateouien
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherElsevier
dc.subject.ddclabelMicroéconomieen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
dp487.pdf
Size:
642.9Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record